In re Bailey

2 F. Cas. 359, 15 Nat. Bank. Reg. 48, 1876 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96
CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts
DecidedNovember 6, 1876
StatusPublished

This text of 2 F. Cas. 359 (In re Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Bailey, 2 F. Cas. 359, 15 Nat. Bank. Reg. 48, 1876 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96 (D. Mass. 1876).

Opinion

LOWELL, District Judge.

This petition is denied, because the statute of 15th August, 1876, (19 Stat. 200, c. 304,) gives authority to notaries public to take depositions and do all other acts in relation to taking testimony to be used in the courts of the United States, and to take acknowledgments and affidavits In the same manner and with the same effect as commissioners of the circuit court Rev. St. § 5017, requires the schedule and inventory to be verified by the oath of the petitioner before a district judge, register, or commissioner; and section 5110 says that no discharge shall be granted to a bankrupt if he has willfully sworn falsely in his affidavit annexed to his schedule or inventory; showing, conclusively, that this verification is an affidavit, which is the only point on which a doubt occurs to me. Petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 F. Cas. 359, 15 Nat. Bank. Reg. 48, 1876 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bailey-mad-1876.