In re Baiamonte

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Baiamonte

785 A.2d 422, 170 N.J. 184, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1498

DecidedDecember 5, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 785 A.2d 422 (In re Baiamonte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Baiamonte, 785 A.2d 422, 170 N.J. 184, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1498 (N.J. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-327, concluding that ANTHONY BAIAMONTE, III, of TOMS RIVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), RPC 1.16(d) (failure to turn over client’s file after termination of representation) and RPC 3.2 (failure to expedite litigation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANTHONY BAIAMONTE, III, is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-327, concluding that ANTHONY BAIAMONTE, III, of TOMS RIVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), RPC 1.16(d) (failure to turn over client’s file after termination of representation) and RPC 3.2 (failure to expedite litigation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANTHONY BAIAMONTE, III, is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

785 A.2d 422, 170 N.J. 184, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-baiamonte-nj-2001.