In Re Bagnell

684 S.E.2d 549, 385 S.C. 242, 2009 S.C. LEXIS 498
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided October 9, 2009·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) has filed a petition asking this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(c), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. After thorough review of the petition, the Court determines that respondent’s interim suspension is warranted. Accordingly, respondent’s license to practice law in this state is hereby suspended until further order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Jean H. Toal C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Bagnell, 684 S.E.2d 549, 385 S.C. 242, 2009 S.C. LEXIS 498 (S.C. 2009).

684 S.E.2d 549 (In Re Bagnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Shaquille O'Neal B.
684 S.E.2d 549 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2009)