In re Bagley

477 S.E.2d 834, 267 Ga. 311, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 3971, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 922
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 12, 1996
DocketS96Y1355
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 477 S.E.2d 834 (In re Bagley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Bagley, 477 S.E.2d 834, 267 Ga. 311, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 3971, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 922 (Ga. 1996).

Opinion

Per curiam.

Charles E. Bagley, Jr., filed a petition for voluntary discipline. He acknowledged his violation of Standard 45 (b) of Bar Rule 4-102, requested a public reprimand, but agreed to accept a 30-day suspension. The State Bar filed its response to the petition and recommended that the petition be accepted.

The review panel concluded that Standard 45 (b) of Bar Rule 4-102 prohibits a lawyer from making a false statement of fact and the Respondent’s conduct violated Standard 45 (b), and recommended that the Respondent be suspended for 30 days.

We accept and adopt the recommendation of the review panel, and order that Charles E. Bagley, Jr., be suspended from the practice of law in the State of Georgia for thirty (30) days from the date of publication of this opinion. The Respondent is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219.

Suspended.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Manning-Wallace
695 S.E.2d 237 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
477 S.E.2d 834, 267 Ga. 311, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 3971, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bagley-ga-1996.