In re Baggett

115 So. 3d 1137, 2013 WL 1924198, 2013 La. LEXIS 1123
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 3, 2013
DocketNo. 2013-B-0821
StatusPublished

This text of 115 So. 3d 1137 (In re Baggett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Baggett, 115 So. 3d 1137, 2013 WL 1924198, 2013 La. LEXIS 1123 (La. 2013).

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent was arrested and charged with driving under the influence of alcohol on three separate occasions. Prior to the institution of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that William B. Baggett, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 1217, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day. It is further ordered that this suspension shall be deferred in its entirety and that respondent shall be placed on probation for a period of five years, subject to the conditions set forth in the petition for consent discipline.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 So. 3d 1137, 2013 WL 1924198, 2013 La. LEXIS 1123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-baggett-la-2013.