In re Baerenklau
This text of 244 A.D. 816 (In re Baerenklau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The commissioner of buildings of the borough of Brooklyn, the appellant herein, appeals from an order entered in Kings county on November 19, 1934, granting the petitioners’ motion for a peremptory order of mandamus and commanding the appellant to cancel a violation filed against the premises No. 1258 East Twenty-third street, borough of Brooklyn, in relation to the installation of an oil burner and the storage of oil in a 275-gallon tank. Peremptory mandamus order affirmed, with costs. Any doubt in respect to the matter can be readily remedied by a clarifying statute. Young, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs in the result, with the following memorandum: The so-called McCall Act (Laws of 1933, chap. 764)
Adding title 2 (§§ 405-416-a) to chapter 9 of the Greater New York Charter. — [Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 A.D. 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-baerenklau-nyappdiv-1935.