In re Badgett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

In re Badgett

653 S.E.2d 884, 2007 N.C. LEXIS 1466, 2007 WL 4105546

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Badgett. Read the opinion of the Court — 362 N.C. 202 →

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 22, 2007·No. No. 173A07.·Published

Opinion

The matter having been calendared for hearing, and the time for the submission of briefs having expired, the Court ex mero moto orders briefing.

Respondent shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order to file a brief. The brief for the Judicial Standards Commission shall be due thirty (30) days from the service of Respondent's brief.

This matter shall be heard without oral argument pursuant to Rule 30(f).

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 22nd day of October, 2007.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The matter having been calendared for hearing, and the time for the submission of briefs having expired, the Court ex mero moto orders briefing.

Respondent shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order to file a brief. The brief for the Judicial Standards Commission shall be due thirty (30) days from the service of Respondent's brief.

This matter shall be heard without oral argument pursuant to Rule 30(f).

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 22nd day of October, 2007.

In re Badgett, 653 S.E.2d 884, 2007 N.C. LEXIS 1466, 2007 WL 4105546 (N.C. 2007).

Pincite

653 S.E.2d 884 (In re Badgett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.