In re BACCUS
Opinion
John Roosevelt Baccus petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to enter a final order on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition within ten days. The district court has now entered a final order and Baccus has appealed from that order. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we deny Baccus’ petition for [610]*610writ of mandamus because it is moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
240 F. App'x 609 (In re BACCUS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.