In re Baby Girl A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Baby Girl A.

38 A.D.3d 648, 830 N.Y.S.2d 668

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 38 A.D.3d 648 (In re Baby Girl A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Baby Girl A., 38 A.D.3d 648, 830 N.Y.S.2d 668 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Danoff, J.), dated July 26, 2006, which, after a hearing pursuant to Family Court Act § 1027, inter alia, paroled the subject child to the mother, with conditions, under the petitioner’s supervision. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated August 3, 2006, enforcement of the order was stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from has been superseded by a subsequent [649]*649order of the Family Court dated January 5, 2007, which granted the relief requested by the petitioner (see Matter of Jazmone S., 307 AD2d 320 [2003]). Thus, this appeal has been rendered academic. Miller, J.E, Spolzino, Ritter and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Danoff, J.), dated July 26, 2006, which, after a hearing pursuant to Family Court Act § 1027, inter alia, paroled the subject child to the mother, with conditions, under the petitioner’s supervision. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated August 3, 2006, enforcement of the order was stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from has been superseded by a subsequent [649]*649order of the Family Court dated January 5, 2007, which granted the relief requested by the petitioner (see Matter of Jazmone S., 307 AD2d 320 [2003]). Thus, this appeal has been rendered academic. Miller, J.E, Spolzino, Ritter and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.3d 648, 830 N.Y.S.2d 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-baby-girl-a-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack