In re "Baby Boy" S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re "Baby Boy" S.

24 A.D.3d 161, 805 N.Y.S.2d 310

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 6, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 A.D.3d 161 (In re "Baby Boy" S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re "Baby Boy" S., 24 A.D.3d 161, 805 N.Y.S.2d 310 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Gayle P. Roberts, J.), entered on or about September 18, 2003, upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, terminating respondent’s parental rights to the subject child and committing the child’s custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A preponderance of the evidence at the dispositional hearing shows that while respondent had made some progress in eliminating the problems that led to the child’s placement, the progress was insufficient to warrant a suspended judgment. Under the circumstances, adoption by the family with whom the child has lived since birth is in his best interests (see Matter of Maryline A., 22 AD3d 227 [2005]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Marlow, Williams, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Gayle P. Roberts, J.), entered on or about September 18, 2003, upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, terminating respondent’s parental rights to the subject child and committing the child’s custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A preponderance of the evidence at the dispositional hearing shows that while respondent had made some progress in eliminating the problems that led to the child’s placement, the progress was insufficient to warrant a suspended judgment. Under the circumstances, adoption by the family with whom the child has lived since birth is in his best interests (see Matter of Maryline A., 22 AD3d 227 [2005]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Marlow, Williams, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.3d 161, 805 N.Y.S.2d 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-baby-boy-s-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack