in Re B & T Distributors, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 7, 2009·No. 04-08-00876-CV·Published

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00876-CV

IN RE B&T DISTRIBUTORS, INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1 PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 7, 2009 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On December 3, 2008, B & T Distributors, Inc. filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial court’s orders denying its motion to dismiss and granting a temporary injunction. We deny the petition. See Evans v. Pringle, 643 S.W.2d 116, 117 -118 (Tex. 1982); Carey v. Looney, 113 Tex. 93, 251 S.W. 1040, 1041 (1923); Zuniga v. Wooster Ladder Co.,119 S.W.3d 856, 861 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 2003, no pet.) Williams v. Murray, 783 S.W.2d 233, 235 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1989, no writ).

The clerk of this court is directed to transmit a copy of this opinion to the attorneys of record, the trial court judge, and the trial court clerk.

PER CURIAM

1

… This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 08-489-CCL, styled Lorina Weaver White v. Constable Don White and B & T Distributors, Inc., pending in the County Court at Law, Kendall County, Texas, the Honorable W illiam Palmer presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re B & T Distributors, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

in Re B & T Distributors, Inc. (in Re B & T Distributors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Evans v. Pringle
643 S.W.2d 116 (Texas Supreme Court, 1982)
Zuniga v. Wooster Ladder Co.
119 S.W.3d 856 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Carey v. Looney
251 S.W. 1040 (Texas Supreme Court, 1923)
Williams v. Murray
783 S.W.2d 233 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1989)