In re B. & J. Concrete Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re B. & J. Concrete Co.

22 A.D.2d 899, 255 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2572

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 899 (In re B. & J. Concrete Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re B. & J. Concrete Co., 22 A.D.2d 899, 255 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2572 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In a special proceeding relating to an assignment for the benefit of creditors, one of the creditors appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 19, 1964, settling the assignee’s account, as; [900]*900(1) allowed a certain claim as a preferred claim; (2) allowed a claim by the United States Government for unpaid taxes; and (3) awarded fees to the assignee’s attorney and accountant. Appeal dismissed, without costs. Appellant did not appear in opposition to the motion to settle the assignee’s account and, accordingly, may not appeal from the order entered upon his default (Matter of Conklin, 7 A D 2d 743; Gersmann v. Walpole, 79 Misc. 49, 51; CPLR 5511). If so advised, appellant may move to open his default pursuant to statute (CPLR 5015, subd. [a]). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a special proceeding relating to an assignment for the benefit of creditors, one of the creditors appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 19, 1964, settling the assignee’s account, as; [900]*900(1) allowed a certain claim as a preferred claim; (2) allowed a claim by the United States Government for unpaid taxes; and (3) awarded fees to the assignee’s attorney and accountant. Appeal dismissed, without costs. Appellant did not appear in opposition to the motion to settle the assignee’s account and, accordingly, may not appeal from the order entered upon his default (Matter of Conklin, 7 A D 2d 743; Gersmann v. Walpole, 79 Misc. 49, 51; CPLR 5511). If so advised, appellant may move to open his default pursuant to statute (CPLR 5015, subd. [a]). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 899, 255 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-b-j-concrete-co-nyappdiv-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack