In re Azhocar

California Court of Appeal

In re Azhocar

49 Cal. App. 352

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedSeptember 22, 1920

DocketCrim. No. 740

StatusPublished

This text of 49 Cal. App. 352 (In re Azhocar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Azhocar, 49 Cal. App. 352 (Cal. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] It appears from the petition for the writ, as well as from the return thereto, that the minor, Esther Galvan Azhocar, is illegally restrained of her liberty. The petition filed in the juvenile court, upon which [353]*353the order adjudging the minor to be a ward of that court was based, was insufficient to confer jurisdiction. It is ordered, therefore, that the minor be discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

[1] It appears from the petition for the writ, as well as from the return thereto, that the minor, Esther Galvan Azhocar, is illegally restrained of her liberty. The petition filed in the juvenile court, upon which [353]*353the order adjudging the minor to be a ward of that court was based, was insufficient to confer jurisdiction. It is ordered, therefore, that the minor be discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 Cal. App. 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-azhocar-calctapp-1920.