In re Azeez

Fourth Circuit

In re Azeez

40 F. App'x 780

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 10, 2002

DocketNo. 02-6642

StatusPublished

This text of 40 F. App'x 780 (In re Azeez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Azeez, 40 F. App'x 780 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jamal A. Azeez petitions this court for a writ of mandamus to compel the district court to rule on his pending petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). The granting of a writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used in extraordinary circumstances. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Azeez’s petition does not set forth exceptional circumstances as would warrant the issuance of a writ of mandamus at this time. We note, however, that no significant action has been taken in the district court for over seven months.

Accordingly, we deny Azeez’s mandamus petition without prejudice to his refiling it should the district court fail to act within a reasonable time. We grant Azeez’s application to proceed on appeal in forma pau-peris and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jamal A. Azeez petitions this court for a writ of mandamus to compel the district court to rule on his pending petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). The granting of a writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used in extraordinary circumstances. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Azeez’s petition does not set forth exceptional circumstances as would warrant the issuance of a writ of mandamus at this time. We note, however, that no significant action has been taken in the district court for over seven months.

Accordingly, we deny Azeez’s mandamus petition without prejudice to his refiling it should the district court fail to act within a reasonable time. We grant Azeez’s application to proceed on appeal in forma pau-peris and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 F. App'x 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-azeez-ca4-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack