In re Ayscue

Fourth Circuit

In re Ayscue

471 F. App'x 212

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 25, 2012

DocketNo. 12-1147

StatusPublished

This text of 471 F. App'x 212 (In re Ayscue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ayscue, 471 F. App'x 212 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Larry Roger Ayscue, Jr., a state prisoner, petitions this court for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order compelling the district court to rule on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The district court dismissed Ayscue’s § 2254 petition on January 31, 2012, 2012 WL 273711. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before us and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Larry Roger Ayscue, Jr., a state prisoner, petitions this court for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order compelling the district court to rule on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The district court dismissed Ayscue’s § 2254 petition on January 31, 2012, 2012 WL 273711. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before us and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

471 F. App'x 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ayscue-ca4-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack