In re Axtell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Axtell

847 A.2d 672, 577 Pa. 559

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 20, 2004

DocketPetition No. 210 DB 2003, 20 RST 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 847 A.2d 672 (In re Axtell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Axtell, 847 A.2d 672, 577 Pa. 559 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2004, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated March 15, 2004, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that JOHN R. AXTELL, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in [560]*560the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2004, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated March 15, 2004, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that JOHN R. AXTELL, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in [560]*560the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

847 A.2d 672, 577 Pa. 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-axtell-pa-2004.