in Re: Avco Corporation
This text of in Re: Avco Corporation (in Re: Avco Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed December 3, 2004.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-04-01147-CV
IN RE AVCO CORPORATION, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On December 2, 2004, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for emergency relief in this Court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator contends the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to disqualify an expert hired by real party in interest, Interstate Southwest, by refusing to disqualify Interstate Southwest=s counsel, by refusing to consider relator=s affidavits in support of the motion to disqualify, and by refusing to extend the trial setting.
After reviewing the evidence admitted in the trial court and the legal authority cited by the parties, we find that relator has not established a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court. Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed December 3, 2004.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Fowler, and Seymore.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Avco Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-avco-corporation-texapp-2004.