In re Autry
This text of 154 A.3d 1261 (In re Autry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed with the Court a petition pursuant to Rule 1:20 — 3(g)(4) and Rule 1:20-11, seeking the immediate temporary suspension of WAYNE A. AUTRY, formerly NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2001;
And on January 12, 2017, the Court having ordered respondent to comply with all outstanding requests from the Office of Attorney Ethics within thirty days or be temporarily suspended from practice without further notice;
And the Office of Attorney Ethics having reported to the Court that respondent has failed to comply with the Court’s Order;
And good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and WAYNE A. AUTRY, is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further
ORDERED that WAYNE A. AUTRY shall also remain suspended from the practice of law pending his compliance with the [110]*110Order of the Court filed March 10, 2016, (D-89-15; 077325), and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further
ORDERED that WAYNE A. AUTRY be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further
ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing or hereinafter deposited in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by WAYNE A. AUTRY pursuant to Rule 1:21-6 be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further
ORDERED that WAYNE A. AUTRY continue to comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of the respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 A.3d 1261, 228 N.J. 109, 2017 WL 784786, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-autry-nj-2017.