In re Autry

116 A.3d 568, 222 N.J. 5, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 653
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided July 2, 2015·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14-286, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20 — 4(f) (default by respondent), that WAYNE ANTONIO AUTRY of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2001, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping improprieties), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to comply with a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WAYNE ANTONIO AUTRY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Autry, 116 A.3d 568, 222 N.J. 5, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 653 (N.J. 2015).

116 A.3d 568 (In re Autry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.