in Re AutoZone Texas, L.P.
This text of in Re AutoZone Texas, L.P. (in Re AutoZone Texas, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 18, 2014
No. 04-14-00784-CV
IN RE AUTOZONE TEXAS, L.P.
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
On November 12, 2014, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on November 18th, 2014.
_____________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 18th day of November, 2014.
_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013-CI-04216, styled Lucio Herrera v. Autozone Texas, L.P., Individually and d/b/a Autozone, pending in the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Gloria Saldana presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re AutoZone Texas, L.P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-autozone-texas-lp-texapp-2014.