In re Austin M.
96 A.D.3d 1423, 945 N.Y.S.2d 908
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 8, 2012·No. Appeal No. 1·Published
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Dandrea L. Ruhlmann, J.), entered June 23, 2011. The order, among other things, adjudged that petitioner did not engage in reasonable efforts to effectuate the adoption of Austin M.
[1424]*1424It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see generally Matter of Fox v Fox, 93 AD3d 1224, 1224 [2012]). Present — Centra, J.P., Fahey, Peradotto, Carni and Sconiers, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Austin M., 96 A.D.3d 1423, 945 N.Y.S.2d 908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
96 A.D.3d 1423 (In re Austin M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fox v. Fox
93 A.D.3d 1224 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)