In re Aulston

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Aulston

650 So. 2d 238, 1995 La. LEXIS 620, 1995 WL 71062

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 17, 1995·No. No. 95-B-0285·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court agrees with Disciplinary Board’s finding that petitioner, Robert Peter Aulston, III, has satisfied the criteria set forth in Rule 19, § 24(E) for Reinstatement and Readmission to the Bar, and adopts the Disciplinary Board’s recommendation.

Accordingly, it is ordered that petitioner be and he is hereby readmitted to the practice of law, subject to the conditions recommended by the Disciplinary Board.

WATSON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The court agrees with Disciplinary Board’s finding that petitioner, Robert Peter Aulston, III, has satisfied the criteria set forth in Rule 19, § 24(E) for Reinstatement and Readmission to the Bar, and adopts the Disciplinary Board’s recommendation.

Accordingly, it is ordered that petitioner be and he is hereby readmitted to the practice of law, subject to the conditions recommended by the Disciplinary Board.

WATSON, J., not on panel.

In re Aulston, 650 So. 2d 238, 1995 La. LEXIS 620, 1995 WL 71062 (La. 1995).

Pincite

650 So. 2d 238 (In re Aulston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.