In Re Atwater

692 S.E.2d 549, 387 S.C. 350
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 20, 2010·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent was suspended on October 12, 2009, for a period of six months. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

/s/JEAN H. TOAL, Chief Justice.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Atwater, 692 S.E.2d 549, 387 S.C. 350 (S.C. 2010).

692 S.E.2d 549 (In Re Atwater) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Charleston Cty. Magistrate Holmes
692 S.E.2d 905 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2010)