In Re Atwater

692 S.E.2d 549, 387 S.C. 350
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedApril 20, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 692 S.E.2d 549 (In Re Atwater) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Atwater, 692 S.E.2d 549, 387 S.C. 350 (S.C. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent was suspended on October 12, 2009, for a period of six months. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

/s/JEAN H. TOAL, Chief Justice.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Charleston Cty. Magistrate Holmes
692 S.E.2d 905 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
692 S.E.2d 549, 387 S.C. 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-atwater-sc-2010.