In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Sturim
302 A.D.2d 309, 757 N.Y.S.2d 840, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1925
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 25, 2003·Published
Opinion
Respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. [See 257 AD2d 127.] Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Williams, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Sturim, 302 A.D.2d 309, 757 N.Y.S.2d 840, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).
302 A.D.2d 309 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Sturim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
257 A.D.2d 127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)