In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Sturim
302 A.D.2d 309, 757 N.Y.S.2d 840, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1925
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 25, 2003
StatusPublished
This text of 302 A.D.2d 309 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Sturim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Sturim, 302 A.D.2d 309, 757 N.Y.S.2d 840, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).
Opinion
Respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. [See 257 AD2d 127.] Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Williams, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
257 A.D.2d 127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
302 A.D.2d 309, 757 N.Y.S.2d 840, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-attorneys-in-violation-of-judiciary-law-468-a-sturim-nyappdiv-2003.