In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
Opinion
Per Curiam. Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1991, was suspended by this Court’s order dated November 20, 1998 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (255 AD2d 827 [1998]).
Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.
Respondent’s application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.
Cardona, PJ., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
34 A.D.3d 918 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.