In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

19 A.D.3d 867, 796 N.Y.S.2d 561

Opinion

PerCuriam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1975, was suspended by this Court’s order dated July 2, 2003 for failure to comply with the attorney registration require- ments of Judiciary Law § 468-a (307 AD2d 374 [2003]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Feters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is fur- ther ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.