In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a Committee on Professional Standards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a Committee on Professional Standards

42 A.D.3d 749, 838 N.Y.S.2d 454

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 13, 2007·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1990, was suspended by this Court’s order dated June 7, 1999 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (262 AD2d 702 [1999]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, PJ., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1990, was suspended by this Court’s order dated June 7, 1999 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (262 AD2d 702 [1999]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, PJ., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a Committee on Professional Standards, 42 A.D.3d 749, 838 N.Y.S.2d 454 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

42 A.D.3d 749 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a Committee on Professional Standards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related