In re Attorneys in Violation of Juciary Law § 468-a
307 A.D.2d 900, 764 N.Y.S.2d 620, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9233
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 28, 2003
StatusPublished
This text of 307 A.D.2d 900 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Juciary Law § 468-a) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Attorneys in Violation of Juciary Law § 468-a, 307 A.D.2d 900, 764 N.Y.S.2d 620, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9233 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).
Opinion
Respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Williams, JJ. [See 230 AD2d 366.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
230 A.D.2d 366 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
307 A.D.2d 900, 764 N.Y.S.2d 620, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-attorneys-in-violation-of-juciary-law-468-a-nyappdiv-2003.