Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Attorneys in Violation of Juciary Law § 468-a

In re Attorneys in Violation of Juciary Law § 468-a

307 A.D.2d 900, 764 N.Y.S.2d 620, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9233
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 28, 2003·Published

Opinion

Respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Williams, JJ. [See 230 AD2d 366.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Attorneys in Violation of Juciary Law § 468-a, 307 A.D.2d 900, 764 N.Y.S.2d 620, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9233 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

307 A.D.2d 900 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Juciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
230 A.D.2d 366 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)