In Re: Attorneys Administratively Suspended Pursuant To Rule 111(B), Pa.R.C.L.E.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In Re: Attorneys Administratively Suspended Pursuant To Rule 111(B), Pa.R.C.L.E.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 17, 2016·No. 49 Inc·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: ATTORNEYS : No. 49 INC ADMINISTRATIVELY SUSPENDED : PURSUANT TO RULE 111(b), : Pa.R.C.L.E. :

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2016, the attorneys named on the attached

list are administratively SUSPENDED pursuant to Pa.R.C.L.E. 111(b). The

suspensions shall be effective thirty days after the date of this Order, pursuant to

Pa.R.D.E. 217.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: ATTORNEYS : No. 49 INC ADMINISTRATIVELY SUSPENDED : PURSUANT TO RULE 111(b), : Pa.R.C.L.E. :

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2016, the attorneys named on the attached

list are administratively SUSPENDED pursuant to Pa.R.C.L.E. 111(b). The

suspensions shall be effective thirty days after the date of this Order, pursuant to

Pa.R.D.E. 217.

In Re: Attorneys Administratively Suspended Pursuant To Rule 111(B), Pa.R.C.L.E., (Pa. 2016).

Pincite

In Re: Attorneys Administratively Suspended Pursuant To Rule 111(B), Pa.R.C.L.E. (In Re: Attorneys Administratively Suspended Pursuant To Rule 111(B), Pa.R.C.L.E.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.