In re Attorney-General

178 N.E.2d 228, 10 N.Y.2d 810, 221 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1961 N.Y. LEXIS 1032
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorney-General. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 N.Y.2d 108
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 5, 1961·Published

Opinion

Motion granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Respondents contended that to construe article 23-A of the General Business Law of the State of New York to permit the Attorney-General to inquire into a book, such as the one in issue, rendered article 23-A unconstitutional because it infringed on the guarantees of free press set forth in the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The Court of Appeals held that article 23-A of the General Business Law as construed was constitutional.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Attorney-General, 178 N.E.2d 228, 10 N.Y.2d 810, 221 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1961 N.Y. LEXIS 1032 (N.Y. 1961).

178 N.E.2d 228 (In re Attorney-General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.