in Re AT&T Services, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company D/B/A AT&T Texas, and AT&T, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re AT&T Services, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company D/B/A AT&T Texas, and AT&T, Inc.

DecidedDecember 10, 2021

Docket01-21-00688-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re AT&T Services, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company D/B/A AT&T Texas, and AT&T, Inc. (in Re AT&T Services, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company D/B/A AT&T Texas, and AT&T, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re AT&T Services, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company D/B/A AT&T Texas, and AT&T, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re AT&T Services, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T Texas and AT&T Inc.

Appellate case number: 01-21-00688-CV

Trial court case number: 20-DCV-273123

Trial court: 458th District Court of Fort Bend County

On December 9, 2021, relators, AT&T Services, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T Texas and AT&T Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion to stay pending mandamus, requesting that we stay the trial court’s order compelling them to produce net worth information, orally rendered on November 23, 2021. We grant relator’s emergency motion to stay the trial court’s order compelling them to produce net worth information. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). This stay is effective until the case in this Court is finally decided or the Court otherwise orders the stay lifted. Any party may file a motion for reconsideration of the stay. See id. 52.10(c). Further, the Court requests that the real parties in interest respond to the petition for writ of mandamus. It is ordered that the response of any interested party, if any, shall be due no later than 20 days from the date of this order. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _____/s/ Sherry Radack_____  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___December 10, 2021_____

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re AT&T Services, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T Texas and AT&T Inc.

Appellate case number: 01-21-00688-CV

Trial court case number: 20-DCV-273123

Trial court: 458th District Court of Fort Bend County

On December 9, 2021, relators, AT&T Services, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T Texas and AT&T Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion to stay pending mandamus, requesting that we stay the trial court’s order compelling them to produce net worth information, orally rendered on November 23, 2021. We grant relator’s emergency motion to stay the trial court’s order compelling them to produce net worth information. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). This stay is effective until the case in this Court is finally decided or the Court otherwise orders the stay lifted. Any party may file a motion for reconsideration of the stay. See id. 52.10(c). Further, the Court requests that the real parties in interest respond to the petition for writ of mandamus. It is ordered that the response of any interested party, if any, shall be due no later than 20 days from the date of this order. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _____/s/ Sherry Radack_____  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___December 10, 2021_____

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in Re AT&T Services, Inc., Southwestern Bell Telephone Company D/B/A AT&T Texas, and AT&T, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-att-services-inc-southwestern-bell-telephone-company-dba-att-texapp-2021.