In re Atkins

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Atkins

36 So. 3d 238, 2010 La. LEXIS 1345, 2010 WL 2542025

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 28, 2010·No. No. 2010-OB-0527·Published

Opinion

In re Disciplinary Counsel;—Other; Applying For Findings and Recommendations (Reinstatement) Office of Disciplinary Board, No. 09-DB-034.

Reinstatement denied. Respondent may not reapply for reinstatement until at least three (3) years have passed from the date of this judgment. Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 24(1).

JOHNSON, J., would admit conditionally for reasons expressed by hearing committee member, Henry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Disciplinary Counsel;—Other; Applying For Findings and Recommendations (Reinstatement) Office of Disciplinary Board, No. 09-DB-034.

Reinstatement denied. Respondent may not reapply for reinstatement until at least three (3) years have passed from the date of this judgment. Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 24(1).

JOHNSON, J., would admit conditionally for reasons expressed by hearing committee member, Henry.

In re Atkins, 36 So. 3d 238, 2010 La. LEXIS 1345, 2010 WL 2542025 (La. 2010).

Pincite

36 So. 3d 238 (In re Atkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.