In re Atkins

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Atkins

644 So. 2d 374, 1994 La. LEXIS 2620, 1994 WL 614146

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Atkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 La. LEXIS 2178 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 4, 1994·No. No. 94-B-1829·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record, and the arguments briefed by disciplinary counsel and respondent, it is the decision of the court that the motion for interim suspension pursuant to Rule XIX, Section 19, is hereby granted.

Further, it is ordered that the necessary disciplinary proceeding be instituted in accordance with Rule XIX, Section 11 and 19.

MOTION GRANTED FOR INTERIM SUSPENSION.

WATSON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record, and the arguments briefed by disciplinary counsel and respondent, it is the decision of the court that the motion for interim suspension pursuant to Rule XIX, Section 19, is hereby granted.

Further, it is ordered that the necessary disciplinary proceeding be instituted in accordance with Rule XIX, Section 11 and 19.

MOTION GRANTED FOR INTERIM SUSPENSION.

WATSON, J., not on panel.

In re Atkins, 644 So. 2d 374, 1994 La. LEXIS 2620, 1994 WL 614146 (La. 1994).

Pincite

644 So. 2d 374 (In re Atkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.