In re Associated Buffalo Architects, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Associated Buffalo Architects, Inc.

221 A.D. 778

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1927·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The audit of the petitioner’s claims by the board of education is a quasi-judicial proceeding. (New York Catholic Protectory v. Rockland County, 212 N. Y. 311; People ex rel. Myers v. Barnes, 114 id. 317; People ex rel. Smith v. Clarke, 174 id. 259.) For its validity, therefore, it is necessary that the petitioner should be given a notice of the time and place of the hearing in respect to its claims, and should be afforded an opportunity thereat to present the same. (People ex rel. Reiser v. Gilon, 121 N. Y. 551; People ex rel. Hallock v. Hennessy, 205 id. 301; People ex rel. Nisbet v. Common Council, 90 Hun, 494.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The audit of the petitioner’s claims by the board of education is a quasi-judicial proceeding. (New York Catholic Protectory v. Rockland County, 212 N. Y. 311; People ex rel. Myers v. Barnes, 114 id. 317; People ex rel. Smith v. Clarke, 174 id. 259.) For its validity, therefore, it is necessary that the petitioner should be given a notice of the time and place of the hearing in respect to its claims, and should be afforded an opportunity thereat to present the same. (People ex rel. Reiser v. Gilon, 121 N. Y. 551; People ex rel. Hallock v. Hennessy, 205 id. 301; People ex rel. Nisbet v. Common Council, 90 Hun, 494.)

In re Associated Buffalo Architects, Inc., 221 A.D. 778 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

221 A.D. 778 (In re Associated Buffalo Architects, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related