In re Ass'n for Retarded Citizens

94 A.D.2d 958, 464 N.Y.S.2d 84, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 24775
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 25, 1983·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We agree that petitioner lacks standing to seek amendment of the conservatorship order. Petitioner’s remedy as “friend” of the conservatee (Mental Hygiene Law, § 77.03, subd [a], par [3]) is limited to seeking removal of the conservators (Mental Hygiene Law, § 77.33) for failure to propose and execute a plan “to insure the preservation, maintenance, and care of the proposed conservatee’s income, assets and personal well-being, including the provision of necessary personal and social protective services” (Mental Hygiene Law, § 77.03, subd [c], par [3]; § 77.19, subd [3]; § 77.29) and appointment of a new conservator. (Appeal from order of Orleans County Court, Miles, J. — dismiss petition.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Green and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Ass'n for Retarded Citizens, 94 A.D.2d 958, 464 N.Y.S.2d 84, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 24775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

94 A.D.2d 958 (In re Ass'n for Retarded Citizens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Conservatorship of Detzel
134 A.D.2d 205 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)