In re Assistant Judge Kroger

Supreme Court of Vermont

In re Assistant Judge Kroger

718 A.2d 922, 168 Vt. 602, 1998 Vt. LEXIS 258

Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided August 31, 1998·No. No. 98-196·Published

Opinion

Upon recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board and no appeal having been filed, the recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board filed on May 11, 1998, is approved and Assistant Judge Althea Kroger is hereby publicly reprimanded for violating Canons 2A, 3C(1) and 4A(2) by engaging in conduct which undermined public confidence [603] in the integrity of the judiciary and brought the office of assistant judge into disrespect. Rules of Supreme Court for Disciplinary Control of Judges, Rules 2(6)(a) and 11(1), (2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board and no appeal having been filed, the recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board filed on May 11, 1998, is approved and Assistant Judge Althea Kroger is hereby publicly reprimanded for violating Canons 2A, 3C(1) and 4A(2) by engaging in conduct which undermined public confidence [603] in the integrity of the judiciary and brought the office of assistant judge into disrespect. Rules of Supreme Court for Disciplinary Control of Judges, Rules 2(6)(a) and 11(1), (2).

In re Assistant Judge Kroger, 718 A.2d 922, 168 Vt. 602, 1998 Vt. LEXIS 258 (Vt. 1998).

Pincite

718 A.2d 922 (In re Assistant Judge Kroger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.