In re Assistant Judge Kroger

Supreme Court of Vermont

In re Assistant Judge Kroger

718 A.2d 922, 168 Vt. 602, 1998 Vt. LEXIS 258

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedAugust 31, 1998

DocketNo. 98-196

StatusPublished

This text of 718 A.2d 922 (In re Assistant Judge Kroger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Assistant Judge Kroger, 718 A.2d 922, 168 Vt. 602, 1998 Vt. LEXIS 258 (Vt. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board and no appeal having been filed, the recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board filed on May 11, 1998, is approved and Assistant Judge Althea Kroger is hereby publicly reprimanded for violating Canons 2A, 3C(1) and 4A(2) by engaging in conduct which undermined public confidence [603]*603in the integrity of the judiciary and brought the office of assistant judge into disrespect. Rules of Supreme Court for Disciplinary Control of Judges, Rules 2(6)(a) and 11(1), (2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board and no appeal having been filed, the recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board filed on May 11, 1998, is approved and Assistant Judge Althea Kroger is hereby publicly reprimanded for violating Canons 2A, 3C(1) and 4A(2) by engaging in conduct which undermined public confidence [603]*603in the integrity of the judiciary and brought the office of assistant judge into disrespect. Rules of Supreme Court for Disciplinary Control of Judges, Rules 2(6)(a) and 11(1), (2).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

718 A.2d 922, 168 Vt. 602, 1998 Vt. LEXIS 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-assistant-judge-kroger-vt-1998.