In re Assistant Judge Gretkowski

Supreme Court of Vermont

In re Assistant Judge Gretkowski

616 A.2d 249, 159 Vt. 627, 1992 Vt. LEXIS 124

Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided November 2, 1992·No. No. 92-091·Published

Opinion

Upon recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board and no appeal having been filed, the revised recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board filed on May 12,1992, is approved and Assistant Judge Elizabeth Gretkowski is hereby publicly reprimanded for violating Canon 3A(4) (engaging in ex parte communication concerning a pending proceeding) and Canon 3A(6) (publicly commenting upon a pending matter). Rules of Supreme Court for Disciplinary Control of Judges, Rule 11(1) and (2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board and no appeal having been filed, the revised recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board filed on May 12,1992, is approved and Assistant Judge Elizabeth Gretkowski is hereby publicly reprimanded for violating Canon 3A(4) (engaging in ex parte communication concerning a pending proceeding) and Canon 3A(6) (publicly commenting upon a pending matter). Rules of Supreme Court for Disciplinary Control of Judges, Rule 11(1) and (2).

In re Assistant Judge Gretkowski, 616 A.2d 249, 159 Vt. 627, 1992 Vt. LEXIS 124 (Vt. 1992).

Pincite

616 A.2d 249 (In re Assistant Judge Gretkowski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.