In re Assistant Judge Etheridge
This text of 617 A.2d 432 (In re Assistant Judge Etheridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board and no appeal having been filed, the recommendation of the Judicial Conduct Board is approved and former assistant judge Phyllis M. Etheridge is hereby publicly reprimanded for violating Canon 3C(l)(a), which requires that “[a] judge should disqualify [herself] in a proceeding in which [her] impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances where .. . [she] has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding.” Rules of Supreme Court for Disciplinary Control of Judges, Rule 11(1) and (2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
617 A.2d 432, 159 Vt. 627, 1992 Vt. LEXIS 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-assistant-judge-etheridge-vt-1992.