In re Assigned Estate of the Order of Tonti

34 A. 440, 173 Pa. 464, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 731
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 3, 1896·No. Appeal, No. 137·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In principle, this case is ruled by Christain’s Appeal, 102 Pa. 184, and other cases, among which are Callahan’s Appeal, 124 Pa. 138, and Fraternal Guardian’s Estate, 159 Pa. 594, cited by the learned auditor.

The action of the court below in dismissing appellants’ exceptions to the auditor’s report is the sole subject of complaint in the several assignments of error respectively. Our examination of the record, with special reference to each of said exceptions, has led us to the conclusion that the court was right in dismissing them and confirming the report. In view of the careful consideration that appears to have been given by the learned auditor to all the material questions in the case, and the [487]*487satisfactory disposition that was made of them, it would serve no useful purpose for us to consider the specifications of error in detail. There is nothing in any of them that requires discussion. They are all dismissed.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Assigned Estate of the Order of Tonti, 34 A. 440, 173 Pa. 464, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 731 (Pa. 1896).

34 A. 440 (In re Assigned Estate of the Order of Tonti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blanarik v. Slavic Progressive Beneficial Union
187 A. 272 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Hagerling v. Pension Mut. Life Insurance
68 Pa. Super. 170 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)