In Re Assaraf

28 A.3d 585, 2011 D.C. App. LEXIS 550, 2011 WL 4084415
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 2011·No. 11-BG-795·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Court of Maryland disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see Attorney Grievance Com’n of Maryland v. Assaraf, 420 Md. 43, 21 A.3d 618 (2011), this court’s July 25, 2011, amended order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, respondent’s response and affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, it is

ORDERED that Steven M. Assaraf is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, nunc pro tunc to August 3, 2011. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007), and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C.2006) (rebutta-ble presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate, including those involving disbarment).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Assaraf, 28 A.3d 585, 2011 D.C. App. LEXIS 550, 2011 WL 4084415 (D.C. 2011).

28 A.3d 585 (In Re Assaraf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Fuller
930 A.2d 194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Assaraf
21 A.3d 618 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2011)
In re Willingham
900 A.2d 165 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2006)