in Re: Aspen Technology, Inc
This text of in Re: Aspen Technology, Inc (in Re: Aspen Technology, Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 5, 2007.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-07-00430-CV
IN RE ASPEN TECHNOLOGY, INC., Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On June 1, 2007, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court, requesting we direct the Honorable Elizabeth Ray, Judge of the 165th District Court of Harris County, Texas, to set aside her order compelling arbitration in Houston before a single arbitrator and to compel arbitration in Boston before an AAA three-member panel. Because relator failed to comply with the requirements of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, it has not established entitlement to the extraordinary relief sought. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5(a), 52.2, 52.3(e) and 52.3 (j)(1)(A). Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 5, 2007.
Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Fowler, and Seymore.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Aspen Technology, Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-aspen-technology-inc-texapp-2007.