in Re: Aspen Heights Construction, LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 3, 2022·No. 05-22-00093-CV·Published

Opinion

DENY and Opinion Filed March 3, 2022

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00093-CV

IN RE ASPEN HEIGHTS CONSTRUCTION, LLC, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-15745

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Molberg In this original proceeding, relator challenges the trial court’s January 31,

2022 contempt order. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that

the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate

appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004)

(orig. proceeding).

Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown its

entitlement to the relief requested. See In re Rowes, No. 05-14-00606-CV, 2014 WL

2452723, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas May 30, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (“A

court cannot grant mandamus relief unless the error was raised in the trial court.”). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We also lift the stay issued

by our February 7, 2022 order.

/Ken Molberg/ KEN MOLBERG 220093f.p05 JUSTICE

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Aspen Heights Construction, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

in Re: Aspen Heights Construction, LLC (in Re: Aspen Heights Construction, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)