In re Ashworth

866 A.2d 255
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 13, 2004
DocketNo. 956 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 866 A.2d 255 (In re Ashworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ashworth, 866 A.2d 255 (Pa. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2004, Joe Carl Ashworth having been suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in the State of Maryland by Order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland filed June 9, 2004; the said Joe Carl Ashworth having been directed on September 1, 2004, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Joe Carl Ashworth is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth consistent with the Order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland filed June 9, 2004, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
866 A.2d 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ashworth-pa-2004.