In re Ashley V.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Ashley V.

91 A.D.3d 788, 936 N.Y.2d 560

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 17, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 91 A.D.3d 788 (In re Ashley V.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ashley V., 91 A.D.3d 788, 936 N.Y.2d 560 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

The mother’s sole contention on this appeal, that she was entitled to a hearing to determine her entitlement to post-termination visitation rights, is not the subject of the order appealed from, and she did not request such relief before the Family Court. Thus, the mother’s contention is not properly before this Court (see Matter of Tylik Shaquwn B. [Chris E.B.], 77 [789]*789AD3d 826 [2010]). Dickerson, J.E, Hall, Cohen and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The mother’s sole contention on this appeal, that she was entitled to a hearing to determine her entitlement to post-termination visitation rights, is not the subject of the order appealed from, and she did not request such relief before the Family Court. Thus, the mother’s contention is not properly before this Court (see Matter of Tylik Shaquwn B. [Chris E.B.], 77 [789]*789AD3d 826 [2010]). Dickerson, J.E, Hall, Cohen and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 A.D.3d 788, 936 N.Y.2d 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ashley-v-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack