In re Ashley V.
91 A.D.3d 788, 936 N.Y.2d 560
Opinion
The mother’s sole contention on this appeal, that she was entitled to a hearing to determine her entitlement to post-termination visitation rights, is not the subject of the order appealed from, and she did not request such relief before the Family Court. Thus, the mother’s contention is not properly before this Court (see Matter of Tylik Shaquwn B. [Chris E.B.], 77 [789]*789AD3d 826 [2010]). Dickerson, J.E, Hall, Cohen and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Ashley V., 91 A.D.3d 788, 936 N.Y.2d 560 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
91 A.D.3d 788 (In re Ashley V.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Tylik Shaquwn B.
77 A.D.3d 826 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)