In re Ashley R.
57 A.D.3d 789, 868 N.Y.2d 893
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 16, 2008·Published
Opinion
Inasmuch as the only child who is the subject of the appeal has since been returned to the father, the appeal has been rendered academic and under the particular circumstances here, an exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply (see Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Servs. v Diognes T., 208 AD2d 844 [1994]; cf. Matter of Ifeiye O., 53 AD3d 501 [2008]). Fisher, J.E, Angiolillo, Dickerson and Belen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Ashley R., 57 A.D.3d 789, 868 N.Y.2d 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
57 A.D.3d 789 (In re Ashley R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Ifeiye O.
53 A.D.3d 501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
New York City Department of Social Services ex rel. Kalisha A. v. Diognes T.
208 A.D.2d 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)