in Re Ashley McAnally

Opinion

Opinion issued October 4, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Without deciding

whether the trial court abused its discretion, we conclude that relator has not

established that she lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. See In re Gulf Exploration,

LLC, 289 S.W.3d 836, 842–43 (Tex. 2009) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we deny

the petition.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Lloyd.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-18-00831-CV ——————————— IN RE ASHLEY MCANALLY, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Ashley McAnally, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s interlocutory order compelling arbitration.1 To obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. 1 The underlying case is Ashley McAnally v. FW Services, Inc. d/b/a Pace Setters Personnel, RDM Detailers, and Houston Auto Auction, Inc., cause number 2018-31425, pending in the 164th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Alexandra Smoots-Thomas presiding.