In re Ashley M.
632 A.2d 723, 33 Conn. App. 904, 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 432
Opinion
We have fully reviewed the records and briefs and considered the oral arguments of the parties. The appeal largely relies on fact bound issues. The trial court’s findings are supported by the evidence and the inferences that may reasonably be drawn therefrom. Having applied the appropriate standard of review, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion and that its decision conforms to the applicable law.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Ashley M., 632 A.2d 723, 33 Conn. App. 904, 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 432 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).
632 A.2d 723 (In re Ashley M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Radicioni, No. Cr 10-204839 (Mar. 3, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 2172 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)