In re Ashley

126 So. 3d 452, 2013 WL 5298476, 2013 La. LEXIS 1988
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 20, 2013·No. No. 2013-B-1512·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected a legal matter and failed to adequately communicate with a client. Following the institution of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Bruce Ashley, II, Louisiana Bar Roll number 2577, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months. This suspension shall be deferred in its entirety, subject to the condition that respondent attend the Louisiana State Bar Association’s Ethics School.

[453] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

JOHNSON, C.J., and VICTORY, J., would reject consent discipline.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Ashley, 126 So. 3d 452, 2013 WL 5298476, 2013 La. LEXIS 1988 (La. 2013).

126 So. 3d 452 (In re Ashley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.