In re Ashley A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Ashley A.

296 A.D.2d 627, 745 N.Y.S.2d 121, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7124

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 3, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 296 A.D.2d 627 (In re Ashley A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ashley A., 296 A.D.2d 627, 745 N.Y.S.2d 121, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7124 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Schoharie County (Bartlett III, J.), entered June 7, 2001, which granted petitioner’s application, [628]*628in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 7, to revoke respondent’s probation.

Respondent was placed on probation after having been adjudicated a person in need of supervision. Thereafter, petitioner charged her with several violations of the terms and conditions of probation. Family Court accepted admissions from respondent that she had, in fact, violated several of the terms of probation. Family Court, however, did not advise petitioner, as required by Family Court Act § 741 (a), that she had the right to remain silent. Such failure is reversible error and compels us to vacate the order of disposition (see, Matter of Shaun U., 288 AD2d 708, 709). As a result, we need not consider the balance of respondent’s arguments.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Family Court of Schoharie County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Schoharie County (Bartlett III, J.), entered June 7, 2001, which granted petitioner’s application, [628]*628in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 7, to revoke respondent’s probation.

Respondent was placed on probation after having been adjudicated a person in need of supervision. Thereafter, petitioner charged her with several violations of the terms and conditions of probation. Family Court accepted admissions from respondent that she had, in fact, violated several of the terms of probation. Family Court, however, did not advise petitioner, as required by Family Court Act § 741 (a), that she had the right to remain silent. Such failure is reversible error and compels us to vacate the order of disposition (see, Matter of Shaun U., 288 AD2d 708, 709). As a result, we need not consider the balance of respondent’s arguments.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Family Court of Schoharie County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

296 A.D.2d 627, 745 N.Y.S.2d 121, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ashley-a-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack