In re Ashford

440 P.2d 76, 50 Haw. 452, 1968 Haw. LEXIS 140
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided June 10, 1968·No. No. 4516·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for rehearing is denied without argument.

Marumoto, J., having dissented from the majority in the original opinion, does not concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Ashford, 440 P.2d 76, 50 Haw. 452, 1968 Haw. LEXIS 140 (haw 1968).

440 P.2d 76 (In re Ashford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gold Coast Neighborhood Association v. State.
403 P.3d 214 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2017)
Laki Kaahumanu v. State of Hawaii, Department Of
682 F.3d 789 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
State v. Hanapi
970 P.2d 485 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1998)
Pub. Access Shoreline v. HAWAII CTY PLANNING COMMISSION
903 P.2d 1246 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1995)
Trustees of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. Yamasaki
737 P.2d 446 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1987)